JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 13, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Franclin Dario Trujillo Lopez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Antioquia Vs. Tribunal Superior De Medellín
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió al Tribunal Superior de Medellín -Sala de Familia-, el expediente de la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Procurador Judicial 194 Penal para que tramite y decida en forma inmediata, de conformidad con lo establecido en el numeral primero del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000, corresponde a los Tribunales Superiores de Distrito Judicial, Administrativos y Consejos Seccionales de la Judicatura, conocer en primera instancia de las acciones de tutela que se interpongan contra cualquier autoridad pública del orden nacional.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. Remitir al Tribunal Superior de Medellin -Sala de Familia-, el expediente de la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Franclin Dario Trujillo Lopez contra el Procurador Judicial 194 Penal, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.